Lolley Premier debut?

[Phil]

My last look at the main forum had no mention of Joe's move.

Forests? Which one. You need the Lost That Loving Feeling forum

[Colgofray]

Sorry young Phil. I meant our main site.

[Phil]

Not much about football on the main site lately

[aberred]

So, still waiting for confirmation but it’s thought to be £750k plus £250k in add-ons.

But the sell-on fee is percentage of profit, so take £350k off for the fee paid and other monies, to us. So we’d be looking at 20 of £400k which is £80k, that’s if my maths is correct!

Not to be sniffed at but not what we’d all have hoped!

[pershoreharrier]

So, still waiting for confirmation but it’s thought to be £750k plus £250k in add-ons.

But the sell-on fee is percentage of profit, so take £350k off for the fee paid and other monies, to us. So we’d be looking at 20 of £400k which is £80k, that’s if my maths is correct!

Not to be sniffed at but not what we’d all have hoped!

But more than enough to meet the income from transfer fees for the season as set out in the vision.

[ograzebrook]

Still no confirmation? Not in the losing forest squad today.

[howells]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

[pershoreharrier]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

Really - in fact CG should be delighted to receive £80K over 2 or 3 years from a Board of amateurs who took advice, signed a player from a local Worcestershire side. who played for harriers for around 6 months from his trial to his signing for Huddersfield and has delivered substantial financial benefits to the club over several years.

[PIRATE OF ZARAGOZA]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

Really - in fact CG should be delighted to receive £80K over 2 or 3 years from a Board of amateurs who took advice, signed a player from a local Worcestershire side. who played for harriers for around 6 months from his trial to his signing for Huddersfield and has delivered substantial financial benefits to the club over several years.

I would be upset too, Huddersfield will receive at least £100 million from TV money this season but can't afford to pay £80k out in one go.

[Phil]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

Looks like Nick got it spot on then.

But the sell-on fee is percentage of profit, so take £350k off for the fee paid and other monies, to us. So we’d be looking at 20 of £400k which is £80k, that’s if my maths is correct!

[jim mankey]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

Really - in fact CG should be delighted to receive £80K over 2 or 3 years from a Board of amateurs who took advice, signed a player from a local Worcestershire side. who played for harriers for around 6 months from his trial to his signing for Huddersfield and has delivered substantial financial benefits to the club over several years.

And in my opinion (amongst others) that board should have resisted selling Joe until after the 4th round game against Sunderland. Who knows what carnage he could have caused against a struggling, under pressure premiership team with a manager on the brink of the sack. Short term greed by the then chairman imo, how much would Joe have been worth if he'd had a good game against Sunderland and how much would it have benefited the club if we'd have forced a replay or better?
Apparently we would have received another payment had Joe played another two more games for Huddersfield, so although 80K is very nice thank you the fact that it's spread over a long period rather dilutes it.

[pershoreharrier]

We get 80k to be payed over 2/3 years. First payment 1st July then the year after. CG is not happy at all.

Really - in fact CG should be delighted to receive £80K over 2 or 3 years from a Board of amateurs who took advice, signed a player from a local Worcestershire side. who played for harriers for around 6 months from his trial to his signing for Huddersfield and has delivered substantial financial benefits to the club over several years.

And in my opinion (amongst others) that board should have resisted selling Joe until after the 4th round game against Sunderland. Who knows what carnage he could have caused against a struggling, under pressure premiership team with a manager on the brink of the sack. Short term greed by the then chairman imo, how much would Joe have been worth if he'd had a good game against Sunderland and how much would it have benefited the club if we'd have forced a replay or better?

A fair observation which I would agree with.

[sprials]

I thought there was a 20% sell on...did he go there that cheap

[jim mankey]

I thought there was a 20% sell on...did he go there that cheap

Like abbered said, 20% of profit.

[redandwhitemike]

On the bench for Forest today.